eISSN: 2618-6446
Latest Issue Archive Future Issues About Us JOURNALS

SETSCI - Volume 3 (2018)
ISAS2018-Winter - 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies, Samsun, Turkey, Nov 30, 2018

Teachers’ Views on Interactive Web Apps (ISAS2018-Winter_141)
Zeynep Tatlı1*, Derya Altınışık2, Göksel Çelenk3
1Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey
2Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey
3Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey
* Corresponding author: zeynepktu@hotmail.com
Published Date: 2019-01-14   |   Page (s): 736-740   |    37     7

ABSTRACT The study aims to analyze the views the teachers, who attended the training on study sheet preparation using
interactive web apps, have about the process. The sample used for case study contains 26 teachers who attended the “Study Sheet
Preparation Using Interactive Web 2.0 Apps” workshop, and who took part in the study on a voluntary basis. In the workshop,
four web 2.0 apps were presented to the teachers, followed by six practices. The data gathered in the study was collected through
a form comprising seven open-ended questions, drawn up by the researchers. The responses provided thus were thereafter used
for content analysis. The responses provided thus were thereafter used for content analysis. In conclusion, it was observed that
the teachers deemed the training a most effective and interesting one, useful for their educational needs. The teachers noted that
they attached greater importance on practical trainings where they acquire the knowledge of what knowledge could come in
handy and how to use certain skills in the classroom, compared to purely theoretical knowledge provided in some trainings. That
is why the provision of interactive web apps in the context of material development, and the incorporation of such tools in the
practices, is recommended.  
KEYWORDS Teacher Training, Web 2.0 Apps, Education Technology, Study Sheet, Material Design
REFERENCES [1] Velagapudi, M. (2013). 18 FREE Web 2.0 Tools for Teachers, WizIQ, Inc. http://www.slideshare.net/susib108/59-18- freeweb20toolsforteachers adresinden 12.11.2018 tarihinde alınmıştır.
[2] Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
[3] Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-a critical review. In Paper for CERI-KERISInternational Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance (pp. 16-17).
[4] Punie, Y. & Cabrera, M. (2006). The Future of ICT and Learning in the Knowledge Society. European Communities.
http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/eur22218en.pdf adresinden 12.11.2018 tarihinde alınmıştır.
[5] Prashnig, B. (2006). Learning styles and personalized teaching. London, UK: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
[6] O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/whatis-web-20.htmlb adresinden 12.11.2018 tarihinde alınmıştır.
[7] Conole, G. & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of web 2.0 tools in higher education.
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2 010.pdf adresinden 12.11.2018 tarihinde alınmıştır.
[8] Lu, J., Lai, M. & Law, N. (2010). Knowledge building in society 2.0: Challenges and opportunities. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds) New science of learning: Computers, cognition and collaboration in Education (pp. 553-567). Newyork, Springer.
[9] Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243-254.
[10] Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. C.A: JoseyBass A WileyCompany.
[11] Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
[12] Günbayı, İ. & Taşdöğen, B. (2012). İlköğretim okullarında çalışan öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitim programları üzerine görüşleri: Bir durum çalışması. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 1(3), 87-117.
[13] Pensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, MCB University Pres, 9(5), 1-6.
[14] Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93-106.
[15] Yükseltürk, E. & Top, E. (2016). Web 2.0 Teknolojilerinin öğretmen eğitiminde kullanımı. K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Ed.) Öğretim teknolojilerinin temelleri teoriler, araştırmalar, eğilimler içinde, (s.555-571). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
[16] Tan, E. (2008). İlköğretim 7. sınıf dil bilgisi öğretiminde zarflar konusuyla ilgili yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma göre hazırlanmış çalışma yapraklarının öğrenci başarısına etkisi (yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
[17] Bozdoğan, A. (2007). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde çalışma yaprakları ile öğretimin öğrencilerin fen bilgisi tutumuna ve mantıksal düşünme becerilerine etkisi (yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
[18] Kösa, T. (2010). Dik izdüşümü ünitesine yönelik geliştirilen çalışma yapraklarının uygulanabilirliğinin incelenmesi. E-journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 5(3), 820-838.
[19] Çelikler, D. (2009). Kimyasal bileşikler konusu için gerçekleştirilen çalışma yapraklarının öğrenci başarısı ve kalıcı öğrenme üzerine etkisi. The First International Congress of Educational Research: “Trends and Issues of Educational Research”, Çanakkale.

SET Technology - Turkey

eISSN  : 2618-6446

E-mail : info@set-science.com
+90 533 2245325

Tokat Technology Development Zone Gaziosmanpaşa University Taşlıçiftlik Campus, 60240 TOKAT-TURKEY
©2018 SET Technology