eISSN: 2618-6446
DOI: doi.org/10.36287/setsci
Latest Issue Archive Future Issues About Us JOURNALS

SETSCI - Volume 4(5) (2019)
HORA2019 - International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, Ürgüp, Turkey, Jul 05, 2019

Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) with Different Insulation Layer Size (HORA2019_28)
Fikret Yıldız1*
1Hakkari University, Hakkari , Turkey
* Corresponding author: fikretyildiz@hakkari.edu.tr
Published Date: 2019-10-12   |   Page (s): 142-145   |    39     7
https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.5.028

ABSTRACT Parasitic capacitance has adverse effect on capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) performance. Reduction of parasitic capacitance, therefore, is essential for high performance CMUT device. Isolation layer between two electrodes of CMUT is one of parasitic capacitance source and used to prevent short connection during operation. Aim of this study is to show effect of insulation layer size on device performance. Partial insulation layer size rather than 100% coverage is investigated on device membrane displacement, capacitance, electromechanical coupling coefficient and transformer ratio. Three different partial insulation layer size used for calculation. These are 25%,50% and 75% of full coverage. Results of partial insulation layer size were compared to full coverage of insulation layer. It was concluded that reducing insulation layer can improve CMUT performance when short connect between electrodes is prevented.
KEYWORDS isolation layer, performance, CMUT
REFERENCES [1] O. Oralkan et al., “Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers: Next-Generation Arrays for Acoustic Imaging,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect., Freq. Control, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1596–1610, 2002.

[2] I. O. Wygant et al., “Integrated ultrasound imaging systems based on capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer arrays,” Proc. IEEE Sensors, vol. 2005, pp. 704–707, 2005.

[3] A. . Ergun, G. G. Yaralioglu, O. Oralkan, and B. . KhuriYakub, MEMS/NEMS Handbook Techniques and Applications. Springer, 2006.

[4] B. T. Khuri-Yakub and O. Oralkan, “Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy.,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 54004–54014, 2011.

[5] H. Wang, X. Wang, C. He, and C. Xue, “Design and Performance Analysis of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Linear Array,” Micromachines, vol.
5, no. 3, pp. 420–431, 2014.

[6] S. Na, L. L. P. Wong, A. I. . Chen, Z. Li, M. Macecek, and J. T. W. Yeow, “A CMUT Array Based on Annular Cell Geometry for Air-coupled Applications,” in IEEE
International Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings, 2016, pp. 1–4.

[7] S. Olcum, F. Y. Yamaner, A. Bozkurt, and A. Atalar, “Deepcollapse operation of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 2475–2483, 2011.

[8] F. Akasheh, J. D. Fraser, S. Bose, and A. Bandyopadhyay, “Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers: modeling the influence of structural parameters on device performance,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 455–468, 2005.

[9] B. Bayram, E. Hæggstr, G. G. Yaralioglu, and B. T. Khuriyakub, “A New Regime for Operating Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers,” vol. 50, no. 9, pp.
1184–1190, 2003.

[10] F. Yildiz, T. Matsunaga, and Y. Haga, “Fabrication and packaging of CMUT using low temperature co-fired ceramic,” Micromachines, vol. 9, no. 11, 2018.

[11] F. Yildiz, “Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT): Analytical Evaluation of Membranes Performance Under Fabrication Related Stress,”
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Univ. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 217–225, 2018.

[12] R. O. Guldiken, J. McLean, and F. L. Degertekin, “CMUTS with dual-electrode structure for improved transmit and receive performance,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 483–491, 2006.

[13] M. N. Senlik, S. Olcum, and A. Atalar, “Improved performance of cMUT with nonuniform membranes,” Proc. - IEEE Ultrason. Symp., vol. 1, no. c, pp. 597–600, 2005.

[14] X. Zhuang, I. O. Wygant, D. Lin, M. Kupnik, Ö. Oralkan, and B. T. Khuri-yakub, “Wafer-Bonded 2-D CMUT Arrays Interconnects with a Supporting Frame,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect., Freq. Control, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 182–192, 2009.

[15] J. P. Raskin, A. R. Brown, B. T. Khuri-Yakub, and G. M. Rebeiz, “Novel parametric-effect MEMS amplifier,” J. Microelectromechanical Syst., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 528–537, 2000.

[16] S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Kreiger, “Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1964.,” New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1964.

[17] I. O. Wygant, M. Kupnik, and B. T. Khuri-yakub, “Analytically Calculating Membrane Displacement and the Equivalent Circuit Model of a Circular,” in IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, 2008, no. 6, pp. 2111–2114.

[18] A. S. Ergun, G. G. Yaralioglu, and B. T. Khuri‐Yakub, “Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers : Theory and Technology,” J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 16, no. 2, pp.76–84, 2003

SET Technology - Turkey

eISSN  : 2618-6446    
DOI : doi.org/10.36287/setsci

E-mail : info@set-science.com
+90 533 2245325

Tokat Technology Development Zone Gaziosmanpaşa University Taşlıçiftlik Campus, 60240 TOKAT-TURKEY
©2018 SET Technology