Presented at the 6th International Symposium on Innovation in Architecture, Planning and Design (SIAP2024), Ankara, Türkiye, Nov 09, 2024

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2024, 20, Page (s): 125-132 , https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.20.16.125

Published Date: 19 November 2024    | 198     0

This study emphasizes the significance of integrating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a systematic method used to evaluate the environmental impacts of a process throughout its entire life cycle, as a vital tool for cultural heritage conservation in Türkiye. The research identifies gaps between current practices and the potential for sustainable development, revealing opportunities for improvement in conservation efforts. While examples from Türkiye often focus on preserving the authenticity of historical structures with visual and cultural value, energy efficiency and the environmental impacts of these buildings are frequently overlooked. An analysis of international case studies demonstrates the successful integration of LCA into restoration projects worldwide, highlighting missed opportunities for Türkiye. By applying LCA, it is possible to facilitate the selection of environmentally friendly methods and materials, promote stakeholder participation, and ensure that restoration practices prioritize sustainability. Therefore, this study aims to reveal the potential of the LCA method in cultural heritage conservation and to demonstrate how its application can contribute to the enhancement of conservation practices in Türkiye, ultimately helping to preserve its cultural heritage for future generations.

Keywords - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Cultural Heritage Conservation, Sustainable Conservation, Environmental Impact Assessment

[1] Khasreen, M. M., Banfill, P. F., & Menzies, G. F. (2009). Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review. Sustainability, 1(3), 674-701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1030674

[2] Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. J Environ Manage. Oct;91(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018.

[3] Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., & Shree, V. (2010). Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 871-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008

[4] Klöpffer W. Life cycle assessment: From the beginning to the current state. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1997;4(4):223-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02986351.

[5] Vilches, A., García-Martínez, A., & Sánchez-Montañés, B. (2017). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 135, 286-301.

[6] Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T. (2011). Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol. 1;45(1):90-6. doi: 10.1021/es101316v.

[7] Choe, C., Moon, J. A., Gu, J., Lee, A., & Lim, H. (2024). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Sustainable Energy Future: A Short Review on Opportunity and Challenge. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100974

[8] Chau, C., Leung, T., & Ng, W. (2015). A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 143, 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023

[9] Nwodo, M. N., & Anumba, C. J. (2019). A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach. Building and Environment, 162, 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290

[10] Liu, M., Zhu, G., & Tian, Y. (2024). The historical evolution and research trends of life cycle assessment. Green Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greenca.2024.08.003

[11] Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2013). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037

[12] Settembre Blundo, D., Ferrari, A.M., Pini, M., Riccardi, M.P., García, J.F. and Fernández del Hoyo, A.P. (2014), "The life cycle approach as an innovative methodology for the recovery and restoration of cultural heritage", Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2012-0016

[13] Settembre Blundo, D., Ferrari, A. M., Fernández del Hoyo, A., Riccardi, M. P., & García Muiña, F. E. (2018). Improving sustainable cultural heritage restoration work through life cycle assessment based model. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.008

[14] Cöcen, O.N., Baniotopoulos C.C. (2013). Heritage Buildings’ Sustainability Assessment Framework. Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2013. Sustainable refurbishment of existing building stock

[15] Nunberg, S., Sutton, S., Eckelman, M. (2019). Planning a Life Cycle Analysis Library and Beta Tool for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Preservation and Exhibition Practices. In: Leal Filho, W., Lackner, B., McGhie, H. (eds) Addressing the Challenges in Communicating Climate Change Across Various Audiences. Climate Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98294-6_32

[16] Foster, G. (2019). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507

[17] Elnaggar, A. (2024). Nine principles of green heritage science: Life cycle assessment as a tool enabling green transformation. Heritage Science, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01114-z

[18] Serrano, T., Kampmann, T., & Ryberg, M. W. (2022). Comparative life-cycle assessment of restoration and renovation of a traditional Danish farmer house. Building and Environment, 219, 109174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109174

[19] Mohaddes Khorassani, S., Ferrari, A.M., Pini, M. et al. Environmental and social impact assessment of cultural heritage restoration and its application to the Uncastillo Fortress. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1297–1318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1493-1

[20] Gómez de Cózar, J. C., Martínez, A. G., López, Í. A., & Alfonsea, M. R. (2019). Life cycle assessment as a decision-making tool for selecting building systems in Heritage Intervention: Case Study of Roman Theatre in Itálica, Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.169

[21] Kayan, B. A., Halim, I. A., & Mahmud, N. S. (2018). Green Maintenance for Heritage Buildings: An appraisal approach for St Paul’s Church in Melaka, Malaysia. International Journal of Technology, 9(7), 1415. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i7.1864

[22] Sedláková, A., Vilčeková, S., Burák, D., Tomková, Ž., Moňoková, A., Doroudiani, S. (2020). Environmental impacts assessment for conversion of an old mill building into a modern apartment building through reconstruction. Building and Environment, 172, 106734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106734

[23] Endo, Y., Takamura, H. (2021). Evaluation of life-cycle assessment analysis: Application to restoration projects and new construction in Alpine climate, Japan. Sustainability, 13(7), 3608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073608

[24] Hu, M., Świerzawski, J. (2024). Assessing the environmental benefits of adaptive reuse in historical buildings. A case study of a life cycle assessment approach. Sustainable Environment, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2024.2375439

[25] Opher, T., Duhamel, M., Posen, I. D., Panesar, D. K., Brugmann, R., Roy, A., Zizzo, R., Sequeira, L., Anvari, A., & MacLean, H. L. (2021). Life cycle GHG assessment of a building restoration: Case study of a heritage industrial building in Toronto, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123819

[26] Nunberg, S., Sutton, S., Eckelman, M. (2019). Planning a Life Cycle Analysis Library and Beta Tool for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Preservation and Exhibition Practices. In: Leal Filho, W., Lackner, B., McGhie, H. (eds) Addressing the Challenges in Communicating Climate Change Across Various Audiences. Climate Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98294-6_32

[27] Bashandy, S., & Abd Elaziz, N. M. (2020). Urban Heritage Life Monitoring: As A Proactive Tool for Sustainable Heritage Areas. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 67(8), 2033–2052.

[28] Tuna Taygun, G., Vural, S. M., Darçın, P., & Aykal, F. D., (2021). Examining Traditional Buildings in Terms of Life Cycle: LEED Assessment of Diyarbakir Houses. International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, And Environmental Design, vol.15, no.2, 57-79.

[29] Güleroğlu, S. K., Karagüler, M. E., Kahraman, İ., & Umdu, E. S. (2020). Methodological approach for performance assessment of historical buildings based on seismic, energy and cost performance: A Mediterranean case. Journal of Building Engineering, 31, 101372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101372

[30] Atmaca, N., Atmaca, A., & Özçetin, A. İ. (2021). The impacts of restoration and reconstruction of a heritage building on life cycle energy consumption and related carbon dioxide emissions. Energy and Buildings, 253, 111507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111507

[31] Dişli, G. (2022). Kültürel Miras ve Koruma Olgusunun Döngüsel Ekonomi ve Sürdürülebilirliğe Katkısı: Türkiye Örnekleminde Bir Değerlendirme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(3), 441-451. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.1084899

[32] Özkaya Kırılmaz, E., & Metin, B. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Wall Panels: A Case Study of Sumerbank Kayseri Textile Factory Restoration Process. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1258158

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.