This study presents a comprehensive overview of biophilic design research that incorporates ecological considerations, specifically focusing on energy efficiency, thermal comfort, and sustainability. While biophilic design has traditionally emphasized human well-being and connection to nature, its integration with ecological performance metrics remains limited. To address this gap, a two-stage methodology was applied. First, 117 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed using Bibliometrix (R) for bibliometric mapping and trend identification. Second, the records were screened using Rayyan.ai, where titles, abstracts, and keywords were reviewed to select the 37 most relevant studies. The results show a clear dominance of sustainability-related topics, with energy efficiency moderately addressed and thermal comfort significantly underrepresented. Thematic and content analyses revealed a lack of studies combining all three ecological themes, despite the growing scholarly attention in recent years. Furthermore, the most productive countries and institutions, particularly in Australia, demonstrate leadership in this interdisciplinary area. The findings highlight the need for more integrated, performance-driven approaches that align biophilic strategies with broader environmental goals. This study contributes valuable insights to guide future research toward more holistic applications of biophilic design in sustainable architecture.

Keywords - Biophilic Design, Sustainability, Energy Efficiency, Thermal Comfort, Bibliometric Analysis

[1] E. B. BURKUT and M. DAL, “Systematic Literature Review and Scientific Maps on Ecological Architecture and Eco-Architecture,” International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 369–380, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.29132/ijpas.1365407.

[2] C. Porteous, “The new eco-architecture: Alternatives from the modern movement,” The New Eco-Architecture: Alternatives from the Modern Movement, pp. 1–224, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.4324/9781315012926.

[3] E. Wilson, “Biophilia,” 1984, Accessed: Jun. 17, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674045231/html

[4] E. O. Wilson, “Biophilia: The Column: Capital Ideas from People Who Publish with Harvard.”,” The New York Times, vol. 14, 1979.

[5] S. Kellert and E. O. Wilson, The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, 1993.

[6] S. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

[7] B. H. Tekin, “Human-Centred Therapeutic Environments: A New Framework for Biophilic Design,” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), Liverpool, 2022.

[8] B. H. Tekin and R. Urbano Gutiérrez, “Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design,” Front Med Technol, vol. 5, p. 1219897, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3389/FMEDT.2023.1219897/BIBTEX.

[9] B. H. Tekin, R. Corcoran, and R. U. Gutiérrez, “A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework of Biophilic Design Parameters in Clinical Environments,” Health Environments Research and Design Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 233–250, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/19375867221118675/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_19375867221118675-FIG2.JPEG.

[10] R. Pacheco, J. Ordóñez, and G. Martínez, “Energy efficient design of building: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3559–3573, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2012.03.045.

[11] B. H. Tekin, R. Corcoran, and R. U. Gutiérrez, “The impact of biophilic design in Maggie’s Centres: A meta-synthesis analysis,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 188–207, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.FOAR.2022.06.013.

[12] UN, “United Nations.” Accessed: Apr. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/37/a37r007.htm

[13] UN, “United Nations.” Accessed: Apr. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/13662/N1238164.pdf?sequence=1&%3BisAllowed=

[14] “Citation Topics – InCites Benchmarking & Analytics.” Accessed: Apr. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://incites.zendesk.com/hc/en-gb/articles/22514077746961-Citation-Topics#h_01HPJ0T6PP68MARZZMX4F4B6B6

[15] Y. Jiang, N. Li, A. Yongga, and W. Yan, “Short-term effects of natural view and daylight from windows on thermal perception, health, and energy-saving potential,” Build Environ, vol. 208, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108575.

[16] S. Sugano, M. Ishii, and S. Tanabe, “Adaptation of indoor ornamental plants to various lighting levels in growth chambers simulating workplace environments,” Sci Rep, vol. 14, no. 1, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67877-y.

[17] S. Tashiro and Y. Harada, “Psychological and physiological thermal effects of biophilic built environment using virtual reality: A pilot study for certified green building,” Build Environ, vol. 270, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112534.

[18] F. Fernandez and F. Zagarella, “Biophilic Architecture and the New Paradigm Building-Man-Environment,” in PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF AR.TEC. (SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING), VOL 3, COLLOQUI.AT.E 2024, R. Corrao, T. Campisi, S. Colajanni, M. Saeli, and C. Vinci, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 612. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, 2025, pp. 319–335. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71867-0_22.

[19] A. L. Pisello, T. M. Amer, and B. Pioppi, “Ten questions concerning living laboratories (LL) for multi-domain comfort investigations,” Build Environ, vol. 276, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112750.

[20] W. Zhong, T. Schroeder, and J. Bekkering, “Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability,” FRONTIERS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 732–753, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001.

[21] M. A. Nitu, O. Gocer, N. Wijesooriya, D. Vijapur, and C. Candido, “A Biophilic Design Approach for Improved Energy Performance in Retrofitting Residential Projects,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14073776.

[22] R. R. Tabassum and J. Park, “Development of a Building Evaluation Framework for Biophilic Design in Architecture,” BUILDINGS, vol. 14, no. 10, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14103254.

[23] M. AlAli, S. Beheiry, and S. Atabay, “Strategies for the Design and Construction of Nature-Inspired & Living Laboratory (NILL 1.0)TM Buildings,” Biomimetics, vol. 9, no. 7, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9070441.

[24] A. Asojo and F. Hazazi, “Biophilic Design Strategies and Indoor Environmental Quality: A Case Study,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 5, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17051816.

[25] M. Ebrahimpour, “Proposing a Framework of Biophilic Design Principles in Hot and Arid Climate of Iran by Using Grounded Theory,” Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 71–78, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2478/cee-2020-0008.

[26] K. O’Sullivan, F. Shirani, R. Hale, and K. Pidgeon Nick and Henwood, “Identity, place narrative and biophilic urban development: Connecting the past, present and future for sustainable liveable cities,” FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, vol. 5, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2023.1139029.

[27] G. Qadir, N. Wijesooriya, A. Brambilla, and F. Alonso-Marroquin, “Improving the Indoor Environment through an Indoor Green Curtain System,” BUILDINGS, vol. 13, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13051307.

[28] I. Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, L. Seduikyte, A. Teixeira-Gomes, A. Mendes, A. Borodinecs, and D. Buzinskaite, “Aging, Living Environment, and Sustainability: What Should be Taken into Account?,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 5, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12051853.

[29] H. Karimi, M. A. Adibhesami, H. Bazazzadeh, and S. Movafagh, “Green Buildings: Human-Centered and Energy Efficiency Optimization Strategies,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 9, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16093681.

[30] M. Cacique and S.-J. Ou, “Biophilic Design as a Strategy for Accomplishing the Idea of Healthy, Sustainable, and Resilient Environments,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095605.

[31] D. S. O. Turan, Y. Afacan, and E. Surer, “Effects of biophilic design on sustainable behaviors: introducing the use of serious game as a measure of sustainable behavior,” ARCHNET-IJAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1108/ARCH-07-2024-0287.

[32] R. Romano, T. Konstantinou, and F. Fiorito, “Beyond sustainability. Regenerative technologies for a restorative indoor environment,” TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, vol. 21, pp. 315–326, 2021, doi: 10.36253/techne-9883.

[33] C. Thampanichwat, C. Moorapun, S. Bunyarittikit, P. Suphavarophas, and P. Phaibulputhipong, “A Systematic Literature Review of Architecture Fostering Green Mindfulness,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043823.

[34] A. S. Shbaita, S. B. Denerel, and B. Asilsoy, “An Evidence-Based Assessment of Biophilic Interior Design in a Traditional Context: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 18, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16187979.

[35] D. R. Jones, “The `Biophilic Organization’: An Integrative Metaphor for Corporate Sustainability,” JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 401–416, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2640-2.

[36] J. L. Brand and S. Augustin, “Can We Sustain Sustainability? A Critical Synthesis of Pertinent Literature,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132212753.

[37] T. Abazari, A. Potvin, C. M. Demers, and L. Gosselin, “A biophilic wellbeing framework for positive indoor-outdoor connections in energy-efficient Arctic buildings,” Build Environ, vol. 226, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109773.

[38] E. J. Lee and S. J. Park, “Toward the Biophilic Residential Regeneration for the Green New Deal,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 5, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052523.

[39] A. F. Ghanem, M. M. Aggour, and M. K. Fahmy, “Developing a tool for meeting children’s needs through biophilic design: a combined approach of the Biophilia Interview and Connection to Nature Index - theoretical study,” OPEN HOUSE INTERNATIONAL-SUSTAINABLE & SMART ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN STUDIES, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1108/OHI-07-2024-0235.

[40] X. Yang, A. Ozaki, Y. Arima, Y. Choi, and S.-J. Yoo, “Numerical modeling of biophilic design incorporating large-scale waterfall into a public building: Combined simulation of heat, air, and water transfer,” Build Environ, vol. 266, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112104.

[41] K. Lyu, R. de Dear, A. Brambilla, and A. Globa, “Restorative benefits of semi-outdoor environments at the workplace: Does the thermal realm matter?,” Build Environ, vol. 222, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109355.

[42] R. A. Qureshi, S. J. Shah, M. Akhtar, W. Abbass, and A. Mohamed, “Investigating Sustainability of the Traditional Courtyard Houses Using Deep Beauty Framework,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116894.

[43] E.-N. D. Madias et al., “The effect of artificial lighting on both biophilic and human-centric design,” JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, vol. 76, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107292.

[44] M. S. Abdelaal, “Biophilic campus: An emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university,” J Clean Prod, vol. 215, pp. 1445–1456, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.185.

[45] W. Rashdan and A. F. Ashour, “Biophilic Design: An Experiment in Teaching Furniture Design Studio,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN EDUCATION, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1111/jade.12552.

[46] O. C. Dewi, A. D. Ismoyo, R. Felly, Aisyah, and L. Yohardi, “Energy-efficient Lighting and Biophilic Design Concept to Boost Reading Interest in Social Facilities’ Library,” in 2020 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND RENEWABLE ENERGY, G. Bastian, E. RomeroCadaval, Q. Tong, A. Brenner, N. P. Le, and H. A. Rahman, Eds., in IOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 505. DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND: IOP PUBLISHING LTD, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/505/1/012008.

[47] C. Genta, S. Favaro, G. Sonetti, C. Barioglio, and P. Lombardi, “Envisioning green solutions for reducing the ecological footprint of a university campus,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 20, no. 3, SI, pp. 423–440, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2019-0039.

[48] T. Abazari, A. Potvin, L. Gosselin, and C. M. H. Demers, “Developing biophilic intermediate spaces for Arctic housing: Optimizing the thermal, visual, and energy performance,” Build Simul, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 857–875, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S12273-024-1126-5/METRICS.

[49] H. Zheng, D. Zhang, M. Schweiker, and M. Loomans, “A review of building technology solutions and their influence on indoor environmental quality in the healthy building movement,” JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, vol. 103, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112086.

[50] K. S. Kayihan, “Examination of Biophilia Phenomenon in the Context of Sustainable Architecture,” in PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD INTERNATIONAL SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS SYMPOSIUM (ISBS 2017), VOL 1, S. Firat, J. Kinuthia, and A. AbuTair, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 6. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, 2018, pp. 80–101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_7.