Open Access

Geographic Identity Process and Ecodesign in Designesart

Raul Cunca1, Carla Paoliello2*
1Department of Product Design/CIEBA, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
2Department of Product Design/CIEBA, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
* Corresponding author: carlapaoliello@gmail.com

Presented at the 7th International Symposium on Innovation in Architecture, Planning and Design (SIAP2025), Gaziantep, Turkiye, Jun 27, 2025

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2025, 23, Page (s): 17-21 , https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.23.4.001

Published Date: 17 July 2025

The Designesart Collection was created as part of the master’s program in Furniture and Interior Design at the Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco’s Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas, Portugal. It is a product series that values inherent Beira Baixa’s territory and identity through its material, environment, society, symbols, and cultural heritage. How does Design embody value to this production? How is their geographic identity process? This paper explores the nature of designs or designing by understanding how it is influenced by aspects of territory, culture, and local materials and techniques. It answers both research questions through theoretical tools: identity and territorial process literature review, objects produced selection and analyses, and data articulation with theories and techniques. Therefore, we explain the importance of the relationship between Design and a local culture. The applied design method inverts the dynamics from global to local, paying attention to fundamental issues concerning the territories’ ecological and social concerns. The nine artifacts studied preserve and rehabilitate forgotten materials and techniques from the past, transmitted from generation to generation. Local identity and territory are central in the Design current panorama as a sustainable model of material culture and revitalization of a place history, transporting memories to the world through new objects.

Keywords - Geography and Identity in Design, Local Culture, Ecodesign, Sustainable Manufacturing

[1] Staszak, J. Other/otherness. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, (2008).

[2] Hall, S. A identidade cultural na pós-modernidade. DP&A Editora, Rio de Janeiro (2006).

[3] Escobar, A. Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependency, Autonomy, and the Making of Words. Duke University Press. (2018).

[4] Yin, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications. (1984).

[5] Di Meo, G. Composantes spatiales, formes et processus géographiques des identités. In Annales de Géographie, 638/639, (2004).

[6] Holzer, W. Sobre territórios e lugaridades. Cidades, 10 (17), 18-29, (2013).

[7] Massey, Doreen B. Um sentido global do lugar. In: Arantes, Antonio A. (Org.). O Espaço da Diferença. p. 176-185. Papirus, Campinas (2008).

[8] Lévy, J. Le Tournant Géographique. Penser l'espace pour lire le Monde. Paris: Berlin (1999).

[9] Dardel, É. O Homem e a Terra: natureza da realidade geográfica. Editora Perspectiva, São Paulo (2011).

[10] Marandola Jr., E. Ainda é possível falar em experiência urbana? Habitar como situação corpo-mundo. Caderno Prudentino de Geografia, 2 (42), 10-43, (2020).
[11] Krenak, A. A vida não é útil. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo, (2020).

[12] Almeida, J. et al. Design e Tecnologia Social: Construindo uma perspectiva decolonial. In: Souza, P. Design para Inovação Social: perspectivas metodológicas e casos relevantes. 127-158. Edufba, Salvador (2021).

[13] Krucken, L. Design e território: valorização de identidades e produtos locais. Studio Nobel, São Paulo (2009).

[14] Bonsiepe, G. Design, cultura e sociedade. Blucher, São Paulo (2011).

[15] Santos, M. Por uma outra globalização: do pensamento único à consciência universal. Record, Rio de Janeiro (2001).

[16] De Pauw, I. C.; Karana, E.; Kandachar, P.; Poppelaars, F. Comparing Biomimicry and Cradle to Cradle with Ecodesign: a case study of student design projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, l (78), 174–183 (2014).

[17] Chambers, R. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development, 22(10), 1437-1454, (1994).

[18] Howitt, R., & Suchet-Pearson, S. Rethinking the building blocks: Ontological pluralism and the idea of 'management'. Geoforum, 37(1), 159-170, (2006).

[19] Illich, I. Tools for Conviviality. Fontana Collins. (1975).

[20] Haraway, D. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press (2003).

[21] Haraway, D. A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the late 20th Century. University of Minnesota Press. (2016).

[22] Escobar, A. Sentipensar con la tierra: Nuevas lecturas sobre sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia. Medellín: unaula. (2014).

0
Citations (Crossref)
7.3K
Total Views
183
Total Downloads

Licence Creative Commons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
SETSCI 2025
info@set-science.com
Copyright © 2025 SETECH
Tokat Technology Development Zone Gaziosmanpaşa University Taşlıçiftlik Campus, 60240 TOKAT-TÜRKİYE