This study proposes a multi-layered reading of the Bursa State Fine Arts Gallery by handling the building as a cultural heritage of the Republican period, symbolizing the government's modernization reforms in the late 1950s. This period corresponds to the first decade of a critical rupture in the Republican policy that was realized by passing to the multi-party system in the late 1940s. Thus, during the re-idealization process of the Republican development, art and art spaces were prevalently used as ideological mediums to refresh the modern and progressive mindset of the state. Accordingly, the Bursa State Fine Arts Gallery carves a special niche as a distinctive art space by reviving the ideals of the Republic, both by its architectural characteristics and urban scale symbolization in Bursa. To compose a multi-layered reading on the Gallery, architectural research and field observation are used besides the discourse analysis on the cultural heritage and the urban identity discourses. Hence, this study revealed that the Bursa State Fine Arts Gallery has gained a special place in the city as an authentic representation of the Republican ideals after the 1950s and houses the reformist attempts of the state as a unique art and cultural heritage in Bursa.

Keywords - The Bursa State Fine Arts Gallery, Cultural heritage, Art spaces, Urban identity, Republican period

[1] Z. Dörtok Abacı, “Bursa’nın Kent Dokusundaki Değişim (18.-19 Yüzyıl)”, in Bursa’nın Kentsel ve Mimari Gelişimi. Cafer Çiftçi (ed.). Bursa: Osmangazi Belediyesi Yayınları, 2007.

[2] S.S. Eray, and İ. Kutlu, “Anadolu’da Selçuklu ve Osmnalı Kent Yapısında Çarşının Konumu ve Maknsal Kurgusu Üzerine Bir İrdeleme” (An Analysis on the Position and Spatial Organization of the Bazaar in the Seljuk and Ottoman Urban Structure in Anatolia), in Kent Akademisi (vol:14, no:2), 506-517. DOI: 10.35674/kent.847196

[3] M. Cerasi, M. Osmanlı Kenti: Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda 18. ve 19. Yüzyıllarda Kent Uygarlığı ve Kent Mimarisi (çev., A. Ataöv), İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 1999.

[4] Z.M. Enlil, “19. Yüzyıl İstanbul’unda Konut Yapı Gelenekleri ve Kent Kültürü”, in Osmanlı Mimarlığının 7 Yüzyılı: Uluslararası Bir Miras. İstanbul: YEM Yayınları, 1999.

[5] S. Sağlam, “1923-1950 Yılları Arasında Türkiye’de Kent ve Kentleşme Olgusu”, in Sosyoloji Konferansları (no:53), 2016, pp. 257-274. DOI: 10.18368/IU/sk.09525

[6] W. J. V. Neill, Urban Planning and Cultural Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

[7] S. Hall, “Introduction: Who Needs Identity”, in Questions of Cultural Identity (eds., Hall, S. and Du Gay, P.), London : SAGE Publications, 2003, pp: 1-18.

[8] K. Robins, “Interrupting Identities: Turkey / Europe”, in Questions of Cultural Identity (eds., Hall, S. and Du Gay, P.), London : SAGE Publications, 2003, pp: 61-87.

[9] R. Jenkins, Social Identity, London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

[10] A. P. Cohen, Symbolic Construction of Community, London and New York: Routledge, 1985.

[11] M. Castells, The Power of Identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997.

[12] C. İlhan, & Ö. Ediz, “Kent Dokusu Morfolojik Değişiminin Fraktal Geometri Aracılığyla Hesaplanması: Bursa Örneği”, in Journal of Architecture and Life (vol:4, no:1), 2019, pp: 117–140. OI:10.26835/my.546927

[13] C. Ulusoy, “İdeoloji ve Mekan İlişkisi Bağlamında Bursa Tahayyüleri”, in International Journal of Social Inquiry (vol:11, no:2), 2018, pp: 349-374.