Open Access

The Tree, The Mansion, and a Nation: Cultural Narratives of the Walking Mansion

Nazlı Taraz Varışlıaslan1*
1Department of Architecture, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, Turkiye
* Corresponding author: nazli.taraz@btu.edu.tr

Presented at the 7th International Symposium on Innovation in Architecture, Planning and Design (SIAP2025), Gaziantep, Turkiye, Jun 27, 2025

SETSCI Conference Proceedings, 2025, 23, Page (s): 411-414 , https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.23.79.001

Published Date: 17 July 2025

The Walking Mansion in Yalova, Türkiye, holds a special place as a symbol of the Early Republican Period. In 1929, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder of the Republic, took a journey from İstanbul to Bursa aboard the Ertuğrul Yacht and encountered a remarkable plane tree situated along the Yalova coast. Atatürk, inspired by the shade, built a mansion for retreats. This two-story residence was completed in twenty-two days. In 1930, Atatürk saw a gardener pruning branches and remarked, “The branch will not be cut, the mansion will be moved!” This led to disassembling the mansion, excavating its foundation, and relocating it five meters east in three days. This study analyses the Walking Mansion through interrelated discourse analysis, integrating cultural narratives and national identity in Türkiye's Early Republican Period, complemented by site analysis for architectural interpretation. Accordingly, it is aimed to understand how an architectural edifice generates a cultural narrative in a newly established Republican state within political, cultural, social, and environmental contexts. Thus, the hidden meanings of the Walking Mansion are unveiled within the Turkish Republic’s history as a cultural narrative that reflects the state's gentle attitude, metaphorically aligned with Republican ideals and its multi-layered representations.

Keywords - The Walking Mansion, Cultural narratives, The Early Republican Period of Türkiye, National identity, Architectural heritage

[1] S. Bozdoğan. Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.

[2] A. Batur. A Concise History: Architecture in Turkey During the 20th Century. İstanbul: Chamber of Architects of Turkey, 2005.

[3] İ. Aslanoğlu. Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı. Ankara: ODTÜ, 1980.

[4] M. Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith), New York: Pantheon Books, 2004.

[5] M. Castells, The Power of Identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997.

[6] C. İlhan, & Ö. Ediz, “Kent Dokusu Morfolojik Değişiminin Fraktal Geometri Aracılığyla Hesaplanması: Bursa Örneği”, in Journal of Architecture and Life (vol:4, no:1), 2019, pp: 117–140. OI:10.26835/my.546927

[7] C. Ulusoy, “İdeoloji ve Mekan İlişkisi Bağlamında Bursa Tahayyüleri”, in International Journal of Social Inquiry (vol:11, no:2), 2018, pp: 349-374.

[8] M. C. Boyer. The City of Collective Memory. London: The MIT Press, 1994.

[9] I. Fairclough and N. Fairclough. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Studies. London: Routledge, 2012.

0
Citations (Crossref)
11.7K
Total Views
198
Total Downloads

Licence Creative Commons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
SETSCI 2025
info@set-science.com
Copyright © 2025 SETECH
Tokat Technology Development Zone Gaziosmanpaşa University Taşlıçiftlik Campus, 60240 TOKAT-TÜRKİYE